Do I Have A Medical Malpractice-Wrongful Death Case?

The scope of the medical malpractice problem.

Data vary dramatically on the number of medical mistakes that occur in the United States. Some studies position the number of medical mistakes in excess of one million annually while other research studies place the number as low as a couple of hundred thousand. It is widely accepted nevertheless that iatrogenic illness (illness or injury brought on by a medical error or medical treatment) is the 3rd leading cause of death in the United States after cardiovascular disease and cancer. See, The JOURNAL of the AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (JAMA) Vol 284, No 4, July 26th 2000.

As a lawyer who has actually restricted his practice to representation of victims hurt by another person's neglect, medical or otherwise, I have gotten thousands of calls from prospective customers over the last 20 years asking me if they have a medical malpractice case. Considering that medical malpractice lawsuits is extremely expensive and extremely lengthy the lawyers in our firm are very careful exactly what medical malpractice cases in which we choose to get included. It is not at all unusual for an attorney, or law office to advance litigation expenditures in excess of $100,000.00 just to obtain a case to trial. are the expenses related to pursuing the litigation which include professional witness charges, deposition expenses, show preparation and court costs. What follows is an outline of the issues, questions and factors to consider that the attorneys in our company think about when talking about with a client a prospective medical malpractice case.

What is Medical Malpractice?

Medical Malpractice is medical treatment that breaches of the "Standard of Care" for medical doctors (or nurses, chiropractors, dental professionals, podiatrists and so on.) which leads to an injury or death. " common slip and fall injuries of Care" suggests medical treatment that an affordable, sensible medical company in the same community need to supply. of cases involve a disagreement over exactly what the appropriate requirement of care is. The requirement of care is normally offered through making use of professional statement from speaking with physicians that practice or teach medication in the very same specialty as the defendant( s).

When did the malpractice take place (Statute of Limitations)?

Rand Spear Law Office
Two Penn Center Plaza, 1500 John F Kennedy Blvd #200, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
+1 215-985-2424

In Ohio the medical malpractice statute of constraints is one year from the date of the malpractice, or the last date the offender dealt with the complainant (victim) or the date the complainant found or reasonably ought to have found the malpractice. Some states have a 2 year statute of limitations. In Ohio if the victim is a small the statute of limitations will not even begin to run till the minor becomes 18 years of ages. Be encouraged nevertheless derivative claims for parents might run many years earlier. If you think you might have a case it is necessary you contact an attorney soon. Irrespective of the statute of limitations, physicians move, witnesses disappear and memories fade. The sooner counsel is engaged the earlier crucial proof can be maintained and the better your possibilities are of prevailing.

What did the doctor do or fail to do?

Merely because a patient does not have an effective result from a surgery, medical procedure or medical treatment does not in and of itself suggest the doctor slipped up. Medical practice is by no indicates a guarantee of health or a total healing. The majority of the time when a patient experiences a not successful result from medical treatment it is not because the medical service provider made a mistake. The majority of the time when there is a bad medical result it is despite good, quality healthcare not because of sub-standard treatment.

Suing a City, County, or State for Injury: Special Rules -

Suing a City, County, or State for Injury: Special Rules - A city, town, county, or state government can be held responsible when it causes injuries, just as any normal person or business can be held liable. However, unlike normal personal injury lawsuits, there are rigid steps to follow and deadlines to meet for an injury claim against the government. Failure to follow these steps or meet a time deadline can sink your injury claim. Here are the main differences and rules you’ll need to watch out for.

When going over a prospective case with a client it is necessary that the client be able to tell us why they believe there was medical neglect. As we all know people often die from cancer, heart problem or organ failure even with good healthcare. However, we also understand that individuals generally should not pass away from knee surgical treatment, appendix removal, hernia repair work or some other "small" surgery. When something extremely unanticipated like that happens it certainly deserves exploring whether there was a medical error. If in doubt most medical malpractice attorneys will discuss your case with you informally on the telephone. Most legal representatives do not charge for an initial assessment in neglect cases.

So what if there was a medical mistake (proximate cause)?

In any carelessness case not just is the burden of proof on the plaintiff to show the medical malpractice the complainant must also prove that as a direct result of the medical neglect some injury or death resulted (damages). This is called "near cause." Considering that medical malpractice litigation is so costly to pursue the injuries need to be substantial to require moving forward with the case. All medical mistakes are "malpractice" nevertheless just a little portion of mistakes generate medical malpractice cases.

By way of example, if a moms and dad takes his boy to the emergency room after a skateboard accident and the ER physician does not do x-rays regardless of an apparent bend in the kid's lower arm and informs the father his son has "simply a sprain" this most likely is medical malpractice. But, if the kid is effectively diagnosed within a couple of days and makes a complete recovery it is unlikely the "damages" are extreme sufficient to carry out a lawsuit that likely would cost in excess of $50,000.00. However, if because of the delay in being appropriately identified, the young boy has to have his arm re-broken and the growth plate is irreparably damaged due to the hold-up then the damages likely would call for additional examination and a possible suit.

Other important factors to consider.

Other problems that are important when determining whether a customer has a malpractice case include the victim's habits and case history. Did the victim do anything to cause or contribute to the bad medical result? A common strategy of medical malpractice defense lawyer is to blame the client. If is a birth trauma case, did the mommy have proper prenatal care, did she smoke or utilize drugs during her pregnancy? In other cases, did the client follow the medical professional's orders, keep his visits, take his medicine as instructed and inform the physician the fact? These are realities that we need to know in order to determine whether the medical professional will have a valid defense to the malpractice suit?

Exactly what takes place if it appears like there is a case?

If it appears that the patient might have been a victim of a medical error, the medical mistake caused a substantial injury or death and the patient was compliant with his physician's orders, then we need to get the patient's medical records. In most cases, getting the medical records involves nothing more mailing a release signed by the client to the medical professional and/or hospital along with a letter asking for the records. When it comes to wrongful death, an administrator of the victims estate has to be appointed in the regional county probate court and then the executor can sign the release requesting the records.

When the records are gotten we review them to make sure they are complete. It is not unusual in medical negligence cases to receive insufficient medical charts. As soon as all the relevant records are gotten they are provided to a certified medical professional for evaluation and viewpoint. If the case is against an emergency clinic physician we have an emergency room doctor examine the case, if it's against a cardiologist we need to acquire a viewpoint from a cardiologist, and so on

. Mainly, what we need to know form the expert is 1) was the healthcare offered below the standard of care, 2) did the offense of the standard of care result in the patients injury or death? If the medical professionals viewpoint is favorable on both counts a claim will be prepared on the customer's behalf and typically submitted in the court of typical pleas in the county where the malpractice was dedicated or in the county where the offender lives. In some minimal scenarios jurisdiction for the malpractice suit could be federal court or some other court.


In sum, an excellent malpractice attorney will thoroughly and completely review any potential malpractice case prior to filing a lawsuit. It's unfair to the victim or the doctors to submit a claim unless the professional tells us that he believes there is a strong basis to bring the claim. Due to the cost of pursuing a medical negligence action no good lawyer has the time or resources to waste on a "frivolous lawsuit."

When speaking with a malpractice lawyer it is necessary to precisely provide the attorney as much detail as possible and answer the legal representative's questions as entirely as possible. Prior to talking to a lawyer consider making some notes so you don't forget some essential truth or scenario the legal representative may need.

Finally, if you believe you may have a malpractice case get in touch with an excellent malpractice attorney as soon as possible so there are no statute of limitations issues in your case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *